John Scalzi writes that, after seeing the latest Star Trek movie, there are a few techie things he never wants to see in his lifetime.
I concur.
Oh, not about the stuff he decries, or not all of it -- I think flying cars are going to be cool, not to mention Transporter Beams'll completely revolutionize the package/food/fuel delivery industry. But I never want to be "plugged in" 24/7 so I can see ads developed just for me, just out of the corner of my eye 'cause of face recog software and my very own personal cookies and purchasing choices.
I'm also not interested in an implanted jack which make cell calls go directly into my ear drum; I don't even have a regular cell phone -- if I'm not home, folks can leave me voice mail, or send me email, which I'm more likely to answer. Oh, and two techs that won't mix: phones like that and flying cars.
I agree with Scalzi about phasers set to disintegrate. That kind of tech would make it too easy for the disreputable to dispose of disruptions to their dishonesty. Too, I have no interest in Minority Report-style pre-crime incarceration, or the technology of far-seeing that can lead us in that direction. (Oh, wait, we already do that.)
Using robots to teach is icky, imo, and puts us that much closer to robot armageddon. Without developing time travel (and the help of John Connor) we'll be sunk.
Speaking of which, while I think time travel might be a bit of a hoot . . . briefly, I'd rather not open that huge can of paradox, thank you very much.
Anything you'd rather not see on our horizon?
I concur.
Oh, not about the stuff he decries, or not all of it -- I think flying cars are going to be cool, not to mention Transporter Beams'll completely revolutionize the package/food/fuel delivery industry. But I never want to be "plugged in" 24/7 so I can see ads developed just for me, just out of the corner of my eye 'cause of face recog software and my very own personal cookies and purchasing choices.
I'm also not interested in an implanted jack which make cell calls go directly into my ear drum; I don't even have a regular cell phone -- if I'm not home, folks can leave me voice mail, or send me email, which I'm more likely to answer. Oh, and two techs that won't mix: phones like that and flying cars.
I agree with Scalzi about phasers set to disintegrate. That kind of tech would make it too easy for the disreputable to dispose of disruptions to their dishonesty. Too, I have no interest in Minority Report-style pre-crime incarceration, or the technology of far-seeing that can lead us in that direction. (Oh, wait, we already do that.)
Using robots to teach is icky, imo, and puts us that much closer to robot armageddon. Without developing time travel (and the help of John Connor) we'll be sunk.
Speaking of which, while I think time travel might be a bit of a hoot . . . briefly, I'd rather not open that huge can of paradox, thank you very much.
Anything you'd rather not see on our horizon?
How I'm Doing:
nervous
Unburden yourself

